The graph below shows the average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.
The figure elucidates the number of carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per individual in four European nations from 1967 to 2007. At first glance, it is evident that the most noticeable alteration occurred in Sweden and is measured in metric tonnes.
To begin with, there was a dramatic growth for CO2 emissions per person in Portugal and Italy where it, initially, stood roughly at just beneath 2 for Portugal and just above 4 for Italy, and it terminated to well beyond 4 and just well across 6 respectively. In the first 10 years, Sweden is following the same pattern as Italy and Portugal where it climbed highly to just over 10 in 1977. Unexpectedly, 1977 to 2007 witnessed an immense drop to finish at the same number as Portugal in 2007.
In contrast, the United Kingdom has a different pattern rather than the other states. The amount of CO2 emissions per individual in this country experienced a significant decline between 1967, which constituted at well below 12, and 2007, which made up at well less than 10.
- some people think newspaper is the most effective way to obtain the latest information because it has more influence than other forms of media. 73
- In some organizations, promotions are based on seniority, while in other organizations, promotions are based on performance. Discuss the advantages of each position. Then indicate which position you think is best and why. 73
- some people think newspaper is the most effective way to obtain the latest information because it has more influence than other forms of media 87
- Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not local people.Why is this the case and what can be done to attract more local people to visit these places? 67
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of boys and girls who participate in 4 kinds of sport outside school hours including the percentage of those who do not 74
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, well, in contrast, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 845.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.80113636364 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64198435902 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607954545455 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 253.8 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.6358422132 43.030603864 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.714285714 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1428571429 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.71428571429 5.23603664747 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.323160737904 0.215688989381 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128528793174 0.103423049105 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0709080005075 0.0843802449381 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.201068481275 0.15604864568 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0180783923752 0.0819641961636 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.