The graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.
The graph illustrates emission of carbon dioxide (CO2) per head in 4 different regions (the UK, Sweden, Italy and Portugal) in 4 decades from 1967 to 2007. It measured in tones.
Overall, all nations saw fluctuation all over the period. Moreover, Italy and Portugal assumed to increase by 2007. In comparison, the UK and Sweden decreased at the end of the period. Besides, Italy and Sweden swap their position and Sweden received to Portugal spot and eventually the UK retain in it’s spot.
A more detail look at the chart reveals, at the beginning of the period CO2 emission accounted for utmost 2t and 4t in Italy and Portugal and both of them experienced dramatically increased in all these 4 decades.
According to the graph, CO2 emission in Sweden was approximately 9t in 1067. In 1977 it had slightly increased (more than 10 t). However, it diminished incredibly (more than a half) between 1977 and 2007. The UK produced more roughly 10t in 1967 and it had lightly decreasing all over the period.
- adQEADS 11
- The chart bellow shows the percentage of people who ate five portions of fruit and vegetables per day in the UK from 2001 to 2008. 67
- Some people tend to believe that the wild animals and birds need extra attention and people should protect them 56
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007. 67
- Nowadays many job seekers are finding jobs that force them to move far from their family and friends Is it a positive or a negative trend What can be done about it 74
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 260, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e roughly 10t in 1967 and it had lightly decreasing all over the period.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, however, if, look, moreover, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 832.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.80924855491 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72780929803 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.554913294798 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 251.1 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 52.2599984502 43.030603864 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.6363636364 112.824112599 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.7272727273 22.9334400587 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.63636363636 5.23603664747 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.301886581894 0.215688989381 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109372196368 0.103423049105 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.123728585441 0.0843802449381 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19975053196 0.15604864568 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.123725849682 0.0819641961636 151% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.1 13.2329268293 69% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.3012195122 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.32 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.