The graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.

Essay topics:

The graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.

The line graph illustrates the average carbon dioxide production person in different countries via the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal from 1967 to 2007. Overall, carbon dioxide emissions in the United Kingdom occupied the largest effusion while Portugal made up the lowest average.
Let me begin by describing the average production in the United Kingdom and Sweden occupied the largest average eruption at around 10 and 9 tonnes respectively in 1967. The average of United kingdom increased slightly from roughly 10 metric tonnes to just over 8 during the period. Meanwhile, the graph shows that Sweden's carbon dioxide emission fluctuated over 40 years, it increased sharply to over 10 tonnes in 1977, then plunged suddenly to 5 between 1977 and 2007.
Also worth noting is that a similar upward trend can be observed in the other two countries; Italy and Portugal. Both stared at the low point, Italy at 4 tonnes while Portugal less than twice. However, these averages continued rising steadily and dramatically from approximately 4 tonnes to just under 8, from around 2 to nearly 6 tonnes respectively.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-09-16 Bao Trang 67 view
2019-09-05 Zhong Yan 84 view
2019-08-08 Vo My Anh 89 view
2019-07-29 Biamsaul 73 view
2019-07-25 anh hoang nguyen 89 view
Essays by user Vo My Anh :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
... suddenly to 5 between 1977 and 2007. Also worth noting is that a similar upward t...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, then, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 941.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19889502762 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64995321997 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618784530387 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 288.9 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.1101158016 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.625 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.625 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.25 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.3980324151 0.215688989381 185% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.168972868062 0.103423049105 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.141000479662 0.0843802449381 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.280185909993 0.15604864568 180% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.171102351602 0.0819641961636 209% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.