The graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.
The given chart illustrate how the amount of CO2 discharged by individuals in 4 seperate countries differ in a 40-year period from 1967 to 2007. All the statistics are given in metric tonnes.
It can be clearly noted that all the figures underwent dramatic changes and after 40 years, the rankings of these 4 nations were not the same as the original.
Starting at nearly 2 metric tonnes at the beginning of the process, Portugal's CO2 emissions per person witnessed a substantial rise to oveer 2 and approximately 4 tonnes in 1987. Quite similarly, in Italy, each citizen released more CO2 into the atmosphere as time passes when the figure increased by 2 metric tonnes after 10 years. In contrast,while Britain had their levels reduced gradually to precisely 10 tonnes in that same period, Sweden's figure had soared to over 10 tonnes before experiencing a remarkable fall by almost 3 tonnes in 1987.
From 1987 on, this trend continued and therefore resulted in the variation of positions. Even though CO2 emissions kept on falling slowly and steadily by nearly 1 ton per 10 years in Britain, the country still ranked the first with over 8 tonnes of emissions. Both Italy and Portugal had a regular increase and both reached its peak in 2007 with nearly 8 tonnes and 6 tonnes, respectively. Meanwhile, this in Sweden plummetted to a bottom of 5 tonnes, which is exactly the same as Portugal.
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007. 89
- The charts below show the percentage water used for different purposed in six areas of the world.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- In many countries insufficient respect is shown to older people. What do you think may be the reason for this? What problems might this cause in society? 89
- IELTS Writing Task 1: tableThe tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade*-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries.Table 73
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free. Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 345, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , while
...etric tonnes after 10 years. In contrast,while Britain had their levels reduced gradua...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, similarly, so, still, therefore, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1167.0 965.302439024 121% => OK
No of words: 239.0 196.424390244 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88284518828 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93187294222 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77910582952 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 106.607317073 140% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623430962343 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 350.1 283.868780488 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.4219775537 43.030603864 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.7 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.2 5.23603664747 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13196309433 0.215688989381 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0494370455625 0.103423049105 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0465473688956 0.0843802449381 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0698919435482 0.15604864568 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0423988071983 0.0819641961636 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 40.7170731707 167% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.