The graph below shows average carbon dioxide emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The graph describes the emissions of CO2 on individual basis in four countries from 1967 to 2007. The emissions increased in Italy and Portugal and decreased in United Kingdom and Sweden in 10 decade period.

To begins with, Portugal and Italy had the lowest rate of CO2 emissions in 1967, at 1 and close to 4 metric tonnes respectively. In next three decades, both Italy and Portugal saw greater increases in CO2 emissions measuring 5 and close to 8 metric tonnes respectively. After 1997, the emissions rate plateaued and continued to remain at same level by 2007.

On the other hand, the CO2 emissions per person were quite high in UK and Sweden in 1967. Each person accounted to 11 metric tonnes of CO2 emissions in UK, while in Sweden it was close to 9 metric tonnes. By 1979, these emissions figure remained steady in UK. But in Sweden, they rose sharply to over 10 metric tonnes. In the following years there was a decrease in these emissions. Sweden saw a tremendous drop from 10 metric tonnes in 1979 to 7 metric tonnes in 1987, coinciding with Italy, and continued to decrease to match levels with Portugal at 5 metric tonnes by 2007. By contrast, UK saw a steady decline in its emissions measuring below 9 metric tonnes in 2007.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 316, Rule ID: CONTINUE_TO_REMAIN[1]
Message: Use simply 'remained'.
Suggestion: remained
... 1997, the emissions rate plateaued and continued to remain at same level by 2007. On the other...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, so, while, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 33.7804878049 148% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1028.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 220.0 196.424390244 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.67272727273 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57385134454 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.490909090909 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 306.9 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.4584955503 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.6666666667 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3333333333 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.75 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191660771137 0.215688989381 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0887623670606 0.103423049105 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0585308469452 0.0843802449381 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165640340793 0.15604864568 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0601642416786 0.0819641961636 73% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.33 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.