The graph below shows the average growth in domestic products in wealthy countries, countries that have adopted a global approach to business and countries that have not.
Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information below
The chart compares the average annual Gross Domestic Product (GDP) growth among three types of countries: wealthy countries, globalisers and non-globalisers from 1960s to 1970s.
It is noticeable that while globalisers average GDP increased significantly over the period, the proportions of wealthy countries and non-globalisers experienced a decrease in their figures.
In the period of 1960s, wealthy countries had the highest average growth in domestic products with nearly 5%, and only 1.3% for globalisers average GDP. Thirty years later, there was a dramatic increase of around 3.5% in the proportions of globalisers, making it the countries with the highest average GDP growth at that time. On the other hand, the percentage of wealthy countries GDP went down significantly to just about 2%.
Looking at the non-globalisers, the figures fluctuated from 1960s to 1990s. Initially, it started to rise from 2.2% to 3.1% in the first ten years, but in the next period from 1970s to 1980s, it declined to only 0.8%. Finally, in the last ten years between 1980s and 1990s, it recovered at around 1.5%
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-27 | cocolico14 | 78 | view |
| 2019-07-15 | GulmiraKusajynkyzy | 78 | view |
| 2019-07-10 | Tran Mai Phuong | 61 | view |
| 2019-07-10 | Tran Mai Phuong | 78 | view |
| 2019-02-11 | Emmanuel Alvarez | 56 | view |
- The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The first chart shows the energy use in an average Australian household. The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from the energy use.Summarise the information below, report changes and make comparisons where necessary 78
- The diagram below shows the process from Australian Bureau of Meteorology of collecting up-to-minute information for the purpose of producting reliable weather forecasts.Describe the process in detail. 84
- The two maps below show an island before and after the construction of some tourist facilities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where necessary 92
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995 - 2002.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, if, look, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 933.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30113636364 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99568711161 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.573863636364 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 253.8 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.7026303127 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.625 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.875 5.23603664747 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172254508781 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0808383934631 0.103423049105 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0768786411591 0.0843802449381 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109345732815 0.15604864568 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.075610929062 0.0819641961636 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.