The graph below shows the consumption of fast food in the U.K per week from 1970 to 1990.
The line graph illustrates the amount of 3 kinds of fast food consumed in the UK over a period of 20 years.
Overall, it can be seen from the chart that there was an upward tendancy in the consumption amout of fast food, with fish and chips witnessing the most damatic rise. However, Pizza exeperienced a remarkable fall and stood at the lowest position at the end of the period.
In 1970, pizza was the most popular type of fast food, with around 300 grams eaten weekly. Meanwhile, fish&chips and hamburger were consumed less, starting at about 90 grams and 30 grams per week respectively. However, in the next 5 years, while the amount of fish&chips and hamburger rosed noticeably to 100 and 50 grams per week successively, there was a slight decline in the consumption of pizza, with approximately 270 grams per week. This figure continued to fall significantly to nearly 210 grams per week. In contrast, fish&chips and hamburger shared a similar pattern, increasing remarkably to around 170 and 100 respectively.
From 1980 to 1985, fish&chips saw a dramatic rise in the amount of consumption to become the most eaten fast food among three types, with 300 grams per week, which nearly tripled that of hamburger (100 grams per week). Moreover, fish& chips and hamburger continued to rocket and reach the peaks of 500 and 300 grams per week in a row in 1990. By contrast, the figure for pizza remained nearly unchanged during 1985 and 1990 at about 200 grams per week, becoming the least favorite fast food of three kinds.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-19 | unstoppable | 67 | view |
| 2024-04-05 | duongpt | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-25 | chau hoang | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-22 | chau hoang | 67 | view |
| 2023-08-01 | Amelia_28 | 73 | view |
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002
- Some people think that the development of technology help decrease crime and other people think that would encourage crime Discuss both views and give your opinion 80
- The charts illustrate in comparison of expenditure between The Great Britain and America. 61
- 1.Wild animals have no place in the 21st century, so protecting them is a waste of resources. To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- The two graphs show the main sources of energy in the USA in the 1980s and the 1990s. 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1270.0 965.302439024 132% => OK
No of words: 264.0 196.424390244 134% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81060606061 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64895980763 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 106.607317073 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.507575757576 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 351.9 283.868780488 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.9314248443 43.030603864 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.454545455 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.72727272727 5.23603664747 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.298692275894 0.215688989381 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123237667498 0.103423049105 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0726148595769 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181929439997 0.15604864568 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0651626079383 0.0819641961636 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.46 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.