The graph below shows the daily average minimum and maximum
levels of air pollutants in four big cities in 2000.
The bar graph shows the lowest and highest levels of Sulphur dioxide (SO2) and Dinitrous Oxide (N20), two air pollutants, in four cities, Los Angeles, Beijing, Calcutta and Mexico in 2000. Overall, the average presence of these two air pollutants substances is much higher in Mexico than the other three cities.
As presented in the graph, the levels of Sulphur Dioxide in the air of Los Angeles ranges from a minimum of 1 to a maximum of 10, which is remarkably lower than in any other city. The level of this air pollutant ranges from 80 to 200 in Mexico which is the highest rate registered in 2000. Moreover, Beijing's SO2's levels are the second-lowest among all, with a minimum of 25, but the second-highest with a maximum of 130. Calcutta's levels, on the other hand, do not show a significant difference between their maximum and minimum, ranging from 47 to 59.
However, the levels of Dinitrous Oxide depict a different scenario, with Beijing being the less polluted city of all four. Japan's capital's levels of n20 range from 14 to 54, which is similar but lower than Calcutta's levels (30 to 52). Los Angeles places as the second city with the highest levels of this air pollutant. Its share goes from a minimum of 39 to a maximum of 104, that is approximately half that of Mexico. In fact, the upper level of n20 in Mexico is 207, with a minimum of 113.
In summary, the highest presence of Sulphur Dioxide and Dinitrous Oxide in Mexico reveal that air pollution in this city is far worse than the other three.
- Many people believe that scientific research should be carried out and controlled by the governments rather than private companies.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 56
- The charts below give Information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy In 2000 and projections for 2050. 56
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995 - 2002. 78
- Many people today are worried about young children using video games. What problemsmight these games cause, for children and society as a whole? How could these problems bereduced? 67
- Nowadays, young people spend too much of their free time in shopping malls. Some people fear that this may have negative effects on young people and the society they live in 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, second, so, in fact, in summary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 33.7804878049 151% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1244.0 965.302439024 129% => OK
No of words: 271.0 196.424390244 138% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.59040590406 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 3.73543355544 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5034935626 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 106.607317073 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.490774907749 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 380.7 283.868780488 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.9952648118 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.666666667 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5833333333 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.23603664747 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208738415237 0.215688989381 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0874573307439 0.103423049105 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0465654291374 0.0843802449381 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143068878934 0.15604864568 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0379023750575 0.0819641961636 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.64 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.