the graph below shows the employment rate of each gender in four countries in 2002
The chart depicts how the both sexes rate of employments in 4 countries namely South Africa, Chile, Finland, Norway changed in 2002.
As an overview, the dominant of employments in 4 countries was man, the female employments in Norway was the highest, followed by Finland, whereas Chile is the lowest.
Looking at the bar chart more closely, it is clearly seen that the amount of female workforce was nearly to the amount of man workforce in two countries namely Finland and Norway. The rate in female in Finland was 65% and nearly 75% in Norway, while male accounted for nearly 70% in Finland and approximately 80% in Norway. There was more different in the rate of both sexes genders workforce in South Africa. Both women and man employees in this countries was low comparison with the others, it took one-third to the female total of countries and about half of the female. There was a big gap between the female and male in working, man accounted for 70% and female was just over 30% in the years 2002.
- some people believe that the development of artificial intelligence will make human labour obsolete 87
- The table below gives information about the economic value of international students in US in 2005 2010 and 2015 The bar graph shows change in the number of international students from three countries in two of those years 87
- Some people say that devoting one s time to family activities is more important than spending time working Others believe that dedicating one s time working 87
- The tale below gives information about management positions help by women in European country in 2006 75
- the government should impose a fee on drivers who use their vehicles during the rush hour to help cut down on air pollution from exhausting fumes 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 443, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...Africa. Both women and man employees in this countries was low comparison with the o...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, so, third, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 836.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.69662921348 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48218625001 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.494382022472 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 248.4 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.1589591371 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.428571429 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4285714286 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146610323127 0.215688989381 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0852226654215 0.103423049105 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0546545728817 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133740713626 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0416377572879 0.0819641961636 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.28 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.