The use of electronic media has a negative effect on personal relationships between people To what extent do you agree or disagree.
It is sometimes argued that personal connections between individuals are negatively affected by use of electronic media. From my perspective, I believe that electronic media can both ruin and upgrade relations between people depending on how they are made use of.
On the one hand, due to the emergence of the Internet, electronic media have undeniably been producing novel communication etiquettes for the past few years. Just by taking advantage of electronic devices like smartphone, laptop, tablet, etc. People can meet face-to-face via screen. Hence, immense distace is so far not a big deal anymore. With the cover of the Internet all over the world, people currently can keep in touch regularly. Various social media such as Facebook, Instagram or Twitter are exceedingly operating in order to satisfy human's demand on a daily basis. Besides, making new friends and groups has never been as effortless as in this era. Electronic media connect everyone together, which makes creating new relationships and extending groups less complicated and challenging.
On the other hand, electronic media still remain negative effects. Firstly, overusing social media can worsen people's communication skills on a certain degree. As a consequence, while facing in real life, people can struggle to interpret their speech and feeling. Secondly, sometimes people don't read or reply to emails and texts on purpose or accidentally without leaving any explanation, which upset and provoke the senders. In the case of meeting face-to-face, the senders can interrrogate the receivers but as for chatting through electronic media, it seems impossible.
In conclusion, while electronic media may negatively impact human's personal relationships, the optimistic effects of using them must also be taken into consideration.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-23 | rslmsayu | 89 | view |
| 2022-08-07 | nguvl | 78 | view |
| 2021-08-20 | Hoangnhi2802 | 81 | view |
| 2019-09-24 | AbdullahArman | 84 | view |
| 2017-07-04 | saeed saamaadii | 72 | view |
- The diagram show two methods of using water to produce electricity Summarise the information be selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The table and bar chart show how journey times in a city centre changed after improvements were made to the transport network and the costs of using different forms of transport in the city Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main fea 67
- The diagram below show the design for a wind turbine and its location Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The chart below gives information about the level of education of Bulgarian people who wanted to go and live in another country in 2002 2006 and 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevan 84
- Some people say that living in a high rise apartment block is a lonely experience because there is no community spirit Others say that people who live in high rise apartments have a much better sense of community than those who live in houses Discuss both 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 291, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...and feeling. Secondly, sometimes people dont read or reply to emails and texts on pu...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, hence, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, while, as for, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1533.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.55434782609 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0232831526 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.68115942029 0.561755894193 121% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.4117800128 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.8125 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.25 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5625 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.287501820907 0.244688304435 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0889539893386 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0824902733096 0.0667982634062 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195078824406 0.151304729494 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0727521146918 0.056905535591 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.61 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.46 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.