The graph below shows information about the activities that New Zealand an Australian children enjoy doing most in 2007.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given bar graph illustrates the leisure activities which youngsters in the two countries of New Zealand and Australia relish doing most in the year 2007.
Overall, the children in Australia enjoyed art and craft the least, but the ones in New Zealand liked this activity the most. It is also noticeable that the Australian children liked sports the most while the New Zealand children enjoyed it the least.
Regarding the first three activities, Australian youngsters took up around 5%, and the New Zealanders occupied about 5 times higher than that figure. The Australians constituted 10% in reading books, and the figure for New Zealanders was about 7% higher. There were no significant differences between the category of playing computer games between the two groups, at exactly 15% for the Australians and around 15% for the other.
Concerning the remaining spare time activities, Australian youngsters covered precisely 15% in watching DVDs, and the other group was around 17%. Going to the park was favored by the children in Australia, at 25%, but this activity was only around 10% among the young New Zealanders. The most favorite activity of the Australian children was playing sports, with nearly 30%, but the figure for the children in New Zealand was only one-third.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-05-01 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 73 | view |
- In many parts of the world some famous people are considered as role models and they are having an increasing influence on the young Is this a positive or negative development 70
- The world should have only one government rather than a national government for each country Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 56
- The diagram shows the life cycle of a monarch butterfly Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 85
- The diagram below shows the changes to the town of Seaville Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- Some people think the money spent on developing technology for space exploration is not justified There are more beneficial ways to spend this money To what extent do you agree or disagree 80
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, regarding, so, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1080.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 209.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16746411483 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65884095492 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535885167464 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 303.3 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 6.0 0.482926829268 1242% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 19.7540431867 43.030603864 46% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 120.0 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2222222222 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.44444444444 5.23603664747 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24635610568 0.215688989381 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12325966796 0.103423049105 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0699200538815 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168055423889 0.15604864568 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0515551568147 0.0819641961636 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.