The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors to three different areas in a European country between 1987 and 2007. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph given compares a European nation in terms of the quantity of international tourists visiting three distinct regions over a period of 20 years from 1987 to 2007.
It is clear from the graph the coast was by far the most appealing destination among travellers. Additionally, increase was witnessed in all categories.
In 1987, there were 40 thousand visitors prefering to have journeys to coastal regions, while standing 20 thousand, the figure for highland areas was twice as low as that of the coast. Likewise, exactly 10 thousand tourists decided to visit lakeside destinations. To 1997, the quantities of the coastal areas and lacustrine trips upsuged to around 52 and approximately 50 thousand respectively, compared to a steady growth in the number of visitors to the mountains.
In 2002, the figure for the lakes underwent a substantial increase to nearly 75 thousand and became the peak of the graph, at which point it began to drop significantly to exactly half of 100 thousand people in 2007. Meanwhile, that of foreigners having trips to the coast was matched with a roughly similar trend to around 63 thousand and then it continues to reach the highest figure, at over 75 thounsand in 2007. By contrast, after having experienced fluctuations in 2002, the quantity of the mountain visits went up to about 35 thousand individuals in 2007.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-16 | honguyenlily | 67 | view |
| 2023-11-02 | tracywu | 73 | view |
| 2023-10-23 | Giang Tran | 61 | view |
| 2023-10-23 | Giang Tran | 61 | view |
| 2023-10-23 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
- The graph below shows the production of three forest industry products in a European country namely timber pulp and paper from 1980 to 2000 78
- Nowadays not enough students choose science subjects in university in many countries Why Effects on society 84
- In the modern world it is no longer necessary to use animals for food clothing or medicine To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Technologies have changed the way children spend their free time Do you think the advantages outweight the disadvatages 78
- The best way to reduce youth crimes is to educate their parents with parental skills To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 227, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... 100 thousand people in 2007. Meanwhile, that of foreigners having trips to the c...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, likewise, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1141.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 226.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04867256637 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93058345167 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 106.607317073 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588495575221 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 327.6 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.2641477407 43.030603864 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.777777778 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1111111111 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.77777777778 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.108249718737 0.215688989381 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0435862490807 0.103423049105 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.038402139242 0.0843802449381 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0694989390759 0.15604864568 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0388573528985 0.0819641961636 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.