The graph below shows the number of passangers rail journeys made in great britain between 1950 and 2004/5
This graph highlights the difference Great Britain's railway journeys from 1950 to 2004/05.
Overall, the first thing to be considered on Light rail, which illustrated less than 300 millions. Two fundamental lines belong to London Underground and National rail network.
There was a positive development in National rail network in the beginning years, but became to the last years there was dramatically want down. In the first three periods, London Underground is leveled off. Began with 1980, it rapidly climbed with fluctuation. This two railways demonstrated upward trends with wild increase and decreases. Another interesting fact is that, this two railway journeys reached a peak.
One major disadvantage of Light rail is fall behind and illustrated small numbers. The railway started activity in 1960. Modestly fall down during 30 years and began moderately increasing belong to Light rail. The highest millions, this railway reached about 230 millions. Another additional information is that, there was sharply went up in 1980 and then wild boomed
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation 56
- Current years a great number of teens are deciding to study oversea What are the advantages and disadvantages of this issue 61
- It must be admitted that in many countries around the world there What are the causes of the problem and give possible solutins 56
- the graph below shows the changes in the places where people used to surf the Internet in the years 1998 2002 and 2004 73
- This graph tries to introduce Great Britain s railway journeys from 1950 to 2004 05
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 898.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.50920245399 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73636138048 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.662576687117 0.547539520022 121% => OK
syllable_count: 246.6 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 22.4926829268 53% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.881256461 43.030603864 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 69.0769230769 112.824112599 61% => OK
Words per sentence: 12.5384615385 22.9334400587 55% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 1.53846153846 5.23603664747 29% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.129603964161 0.215688989381 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0445209696215 0.103423049105 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.081957390015 0.0843802449381 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113992405904 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.118685711791 0.0819641961636 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.76 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.79 11.4140731707 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.4329268293 52% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.8 10.9970731707 62% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.