The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph illustrates how the population of tourists changed dropping in certain island in Caribbean from 2010 to 2017.
To sum up, the total number of visitors was increasing steadily. Additionally, there were also different degrees of climb of that in specific places, which are cruise ships and island.
The total rise of the number of tourists who came to visit the Caribbean island is magnificent.
During the first five years witnessed a consistently grow from 1millions in 2010 to about 2.75millions before leveling off between 2015 to 2016, followed by a surge to 3.5 until 2017.
On the other hand, the number of visitors who stayed on cruise ships and on island had experienced a less fierce climb during from 2010 to 2017. The population of visitors staying on island kept stable, which is 0.75millions. However, before a fluctuate between 2013 to 2017 at 1.5million, there were a gradually grow between 2011 and 2012. Similarly, populations in 2010 starting at 0.25millions of visitors who stay on cruise ships, a slight climb of almost 0.25millions could be found, followed by a same level of decline next year. After that, from 2012 to 2017 experienced a steady increase.
- When new towns are planned it is more important to build more public parks or sports facilities than shopping centers for people to spend their free time To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- total school spending 67
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household 61
- Some people believe that professionals such as doctors and engineers should be required to work in the country where they did their training Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish 61
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 243, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... which is 0.75millions. However, before a fluctuate between 2013 to 2017 at 1.5million, the...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 598, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... to 2017 experienced a steady increase.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, similarly, so, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 33.7804878049 148% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1001.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05555555556 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81140799181 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565656565657 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 278.1 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.568451889 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.1 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.9 5.23603664747 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202106966626 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0868703279712 0.103423049105 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0668100716811 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131142896602 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0666941081323 0.0819641961636 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.61 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.