The graph below shows the number of visitors to three museums between 2000 and 2005.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given graph illustrates how many people came to three different museums from 2000 to 2005.
Overall, it is noticeable to see that the figure for the National Museum in China and MET one in New York both experienced an upward trend, while individuals traveled to Edo museum in Tokyo less and less.
In 2000, the statistic of MET museum started at 12 million, before leveling off at 6 million in 2002. In the interim, the number of citizens visiting the museum in Tokyo remained stable at around 13,5 million, followed by a considerable fall of 4 million in the year 2002. The data of the National museum kept going up gradually from approximately 6 million in 2000 to 9 million in 2002.
In the following years, starting in 2003, the figure for China's museum continued its upward trend and peaked at almost 16 million. Meanwhile, the number of visitors to both MET and Edo museum underwent a steady rise of 7 million and 4 million, respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-08 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-27 | Dua5 | 84 | view |
| 2023-03-28 | Sadullayev Nodirbek | 82 | view |
| 2022-03-08 | lethaianh | 87 | view |
| 2022-03-06 | lethaianh | 55 | view |
- The graph below shows the number of visitors to two tourist destinations in Italy from 2005 to 2015 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The graph below shows the number of visitors to three museums between 2000 and 2005 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 87
- Open plan office no walls no barriers Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 61
- The graph below shows the number of visitors to three museums between 2000 and 2005 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 55
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 789.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.7245508982 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67077951447 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.586826347305 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 233.1 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.576450548 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.714285714 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8571428571 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.28571428571 5.23603664747 25% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131473325111 0.215688989381 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0751667752035 0.103423049105 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0492225483395 0.0843802449381 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0962719424082 0.15604864568 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0537358853416 0.0819641961636 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.