The graph below shows the percentage of people who travelled by bus in the UK from
2009 to 2011. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features
and make comparisons where relevant.
The given table depicts the proportion of people who used the bus for travelling for various
purposes between 2009 and 2011. It is evident from the table that bus was the most preferred
mode for going shopping and the least preferred mode for going to work.
In 2009, 65% people went shopping by bus. This percentage dropped significantly and
reached just over 50% by 2011. Nearly a fifth used the bus for visiting friends in 2009 and
2010. This percentage increased slightly and in 2011, when just under a quarter of people
used the bus for this purpose.
Commuting for work by bus was done by 5%, in 2009. This percentage dropped significantly
and by 2011, hardly any person travelled by bus for going to work. Using the bus for study
and day tour showed similar trends, but the use of bus for day tour was done by about 3%
more people in all the given years.
Overall, it can be seen that the use of bus for shopping and going to work became less, year
by year, whereas for the other purposes the use of bus increased over the given time.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-29 | er rashmi | 78 | view |
| 2021-07-21 | dhruv j patel | 56 | view |
| 2021-07-21 | dhruv j patel | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-22 | Sadhanaraee | 71 | view |
| 2019-12-02 | Sarbjeet kaur | 83 | view |
- The illustration show how chocolate is produced 11
- The graph below show the spending on research into renewable sources of energy in four countries between 1975 and 2000 summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Some people believe the range of technology available to individuals today is increasing the gap between poor people and rich people Others think it is having an opposite effect Discuss these points of view What is your opinion 78
- The chart below shows the male and female internet users aged 15 24 in Canada in 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 10
- The given line graph shows the past and projected figures on the government spending as a percentage of GDP for the years 2000 to 2025 in three areas 52
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 93, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... used the bus for travelling for various purposes between 2009 and 2011. It is ev...
^^^
Line 2, column 93, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he table that bus was the most preferred mode for going shopping and the least pr...
^^^
Line 4, column 84, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...his percentage dropped significantly and reached just over 50% by 2011. Nearly a ...
^^^
Line 5, column 92, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the bus for visiting friends in 2009 and 2010. This percentage increased slightly...
^^^
Line 6, column 90, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...011, when just under a quarter of people used the bus for this purpose. Commuti...
^^^
Line 8, column 89, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...9. This percentage dropped significantly and by 2011, hardly any person travelled...
^^^
Line 9, column 91, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r going to work. Using the bus for study and day tour showed similar trends, but ...
^^^
Line 10, column 89, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...of bus for day tour was done by about 3% more people in all the given years. Ov...
^^^
Line 12, column 93, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ping and going to work became less, year by year, whereas for the other purposes ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, whereas, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 871.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.53645833333 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.23897157342 2.65546596893 84% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.484375 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 244.8 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.2297351368 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.1 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.8 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 13.0 3.83414634146 339% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 9.0 1.69756097561 530% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175656934823 0.215688989381 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10042920774 0.103423049105 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0438639556779 0.0843802449381 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0845311490275 0.15604864568 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0483420935155 0.0819641961636 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.05 11.4140731707 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.47 8.06136585366 80% => OK
difficult_words: 23.0 40.7170731707 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.