The graph below shows the popularity of different fast foods in Britain and the trends in their consumption. Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below.

Essay topics:

The graph below shows the popularity of different fast foods in Britain and the trends in their consumption. Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below.

The Pie chart illustrates the demand for fast-food, like, Hamburger, Fish and Chips, and Pizza over a period of 20 years between 1970 to 1990 in Britain.

As it is presented in the Pie chart, in 1970 Pizza has the maximum demand of nearly 300 gm followed by fish and chips and hamburger which were below 100 gm. Thereafter, there was a steady rise in demand for Fish and chips and Hamburger between 1970 to 1980. However, the trend was opposite for Pizza, which has a steady downfall till 1985, and reached to 200 gm from 300 gm in 1970.

After 1980, the trend for Fish and chips and Hamburgers indicated the rapid change, wherein next 10 year Fish and chip reached to a need of 500 gm from 150 gm in 1980. And in the case of Hamburger it reached to nearly 280 gm in 1990. While, the Pizza saw a slight change in 1970 and reached to roughly 220 gm in 1970 from 200 gm in 1985.

Overall, Fish and chips and Hamburger demand increased over the period of 20 years. Where Fish and chips has the highest demand in 1970. On the other hand, Pizza followed a downfall in 20 years.

Votes
Average: 1.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-11-09 VINAY KHANDURI 11 view
2019-11-09 VINAY KHANDURI 11 view
Essays by user VINAY KHANDURI :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 155, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &nbsp
...ighest demand in 1970. On the other hand, Pizza followed a downfall in 20 years. ...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, while, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 6.8 221% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 938.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66666666667 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63897405346 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.482587064677 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 224.1 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.1 1.45097560976 76% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.9684813874 43.030603864 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.8 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.3 5.23603664747 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0583298652033 0.215688989381 27% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0240131262213 0.103423049105 23% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0303905959679 0.0843802449381 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0453790240191 0.15604864568 29% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.03664680799 0.0819641961636 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 93.48 61.2550243902 153% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.2 10.3012195122 50% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.14 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.