The line graph depicts the growth in population of two asian countries, India and China, from 2000 to estimations for as far as 30 years in the future.
At a glance, Indian population can be seen growing throughout, whereas China’s trend shows a downward trend nearing the end years of the projection. At the point where this slope begins China and India’s population is projected to be the same.
Looking at the data from 2000 till present both China and India show a steady growth in the number of citizens in the country. Where India has a total count of 1 billion in 2000, China is at roughly 1.25 billion. Both numbers increase steadily, India’s at a faster rate, such that the initial gap can be seen closing to the point where the counts are expected to meet in 2030 just about 1.4 billion.
At which point, India’s population is projected to keep on growing and become higher than China’s. The latter, conversely, is seen dropping at slow rate, dropping to just below 1.4 billion in 2050.
- Many people go through life doing work that they hate or have no talent for Why does this happen What are the consequences of this situation 88
- The graph shows data about the annual earnings of three bakeries in Calgary 2000 2010 89
- The chart below gives information about trends in internet use by females in the USA in two years
- The diagram below shows a possible future means of home energy production 11
- Some people argue that all experimentation on animals is bad and should be outlawed However others believe that important scientific discoveries can be made from animal experiments Can experimentation on animals be justified Are there any alternatives 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, look, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 839.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.74011299435 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48724923533 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576271186441 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 233.1 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.4813380856 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.875 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.125 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.125 5.23603664747 60% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249162165428 0.215688989381 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123694303017 0.103423049105 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0606997352445 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168438681929 0.15604864568 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0511989043061 0.0819641961636 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.