The graph below shows the pollution levels in London between 1600 and 2000.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph compares the amount of sulphur and smoke produced in London from 1600 to 2000.
Overall, sulphur dioxide was the primary contributor to pollution throughout the entire period. In addition, both pollutants experienced peaks in emission levels prior to gradually decreasing to zero by the end of the surveyed period
Specifically, commencing with merely over 0.1 micrograms by 1600, the sulphur dioxide level drastically rose to nearly 750 micrograms in 1700. Following this surge, sulphur dioxide emmissions remained relatively stable between 1700 and 1750 and peaked at 770 micrograms until 1750. Subsequently, there was another notable peak in 1850, with the level of sulphur dioxide reaching about 900 micrograms before a sharp drop in the figure to 0 in 2000
Furthermore, the amount of smoke began at 0.1 micrograms in 1600 and steadily rose to nearly 500 micrograms in 1900. Similarly, the trend for smoke emission followed the same pattern as that of sulphur dioxide. Interestingly, both line witnessed signifcant fluctuations in a downward trajectory during the declining period, ultimately reaching zero in 2000.
- The graph below shows population figures for India and China since the year 2000 and predicted population growth up until 2050 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The chart gives information on the percentage of women going into higher education in five countries for the years 1980 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The graph below shows the pollution levels in London between 1600 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The graph below shows population figures for India and China since the year 2000 and predicted population growth up until 2050 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The graph below gives information about changes in the birth and death rates in New Zealand between 1901 and 2101 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, similarly, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 965.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48295454545 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92647835601 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619318181818 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 281.7 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 78.7390419976 43.030603864 183% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.857142857 112.824112599 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1428571429 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.28571428571 5.23603664747 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114334041208 0.215688989381 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0579940708393 0.103423049105 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0498746275956 0.0843802449381 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0846378852883 0.15604864568 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0472784708859 0.0819641961636 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.2329268293 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 61.2550243902 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.8 11.4140731707 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.06136585366 116% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.