The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport.

Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The line chart illustrates that four different kinds of commercial transportation in the UK over the 28 years.

It is noticeable that four types of carriages were on the rise from 1974 to 2002, however, using rail to transport goods increased the least in these modes. However, road transportation was always the popular form in cargo transportation.

From 1974 to 2002, highway transportation was the highest good transported in UK which the tonnes increased from 70 million to nearly 100 million. At the same time, the transportation kind of pipeline was in the same trend which increased from nearly 0 million to 21 million tonnes. However, people in UK who preferred to choose road transportation instead of pipeline because the pipeline method was the lowest quantities in these four transportation types.

In addition, through water and rail to transport good were nearly the same which were 39 million and 40 million in 1974. Nevertheless, in the pass 27 years, water transportation increased over rail transportation and the turning point was in 1978. Although railway transportation decreased, from 1994, this kind of transported increased. In 2002, the quantities of goods was over the 1974 which transported 41 million tonnes.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-10-17 MinyiChu 67 view
Essays by user MinyiChu :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, nevertheless, in addition, kind of

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1049.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29797979798 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18126097414 2.65546596893 120% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.479797979798 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 285.3 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.776668719 43.030603864 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.9 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.7 5.23603664747 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262183539382 0.215688989381 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136190060853 0.103423049105 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0521686539215 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184760873138 0.15604864568 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0203176947126 0.0819641961636 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.13 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.