The graph below shows UK acid rain emissions, measured in millions of tonnes, from four different sectors between 1990 and 2007.
The line graph below describes the percentage of acid rains in the UK which is caused by four different reasons from 1991 to 2007.
Overall, the number of acid rains is released the most by Electricity, gas and water supply then it replaced by Transport and communication at the end. However, there is a decline in acid rains emissions which made by four reasons.
The proportion of acid rains emissions was created by Electricity, gas, and water supply which held the highest position in 1991 nearly 3.5% then followed by Other industries, Transport, and communication and Domestic respectively at 2.1 %, 0.7%, and 0.6%. In addition, the UK Electricity, gas, and water supply witnessed a notable change which decreased significantly to 0.5% in 2007. Moreover, there was a slight fall in the percentage of acid rains emissions by Other industries to 1.2% in 2007. Furthermore, the acid rains emissions in Domestic has fallen gradually in the next 15 years at 0.1%.
On the other hand, Transport and communication created acid rains emissions which showed a short increase to 1% then decreased a bit at 0.6% in the last year.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-09-27 | lattethuc | 73 | view |
| 2022-08-02 | Hanabi | 84 | view |
| 2022-07-26 | @annie3010 | 84 | view |
| 2022-07-21 | Trần Chí Hiển | view | |
| 2022-01-23 | moyonakako | 80 | view |
- The graph shows the percentage of people who use mobile phones in four situations grouped into four age groups 67
- Nowadays a large amount of advertising aimed at children should be banned because of the negative effects To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Some people believe that international sporting events are the ideal opportunity to show the world the qualities of the hosting nation Others believe that these events are mainly a large unjustifiable expense 56
- The maps below show the village of Stokeford in 1930 and 2010 84
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 10, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'graphs'.
Suggestion: graphs
The line graph below describes the percentage of acid ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, then, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 939.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99468085106 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90705954753 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 272.7 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.3059390132 43.030603864 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.375 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 5.23603664747 181% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.288711821809 0.215688989381 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.152812293244 0.103423049105 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0961114765107 0.0843802449381 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.211065350068 0.15604864568 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.09787299083 0.0819641961636 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.