The graph shows the amount earned by graduates of different age groups in 2002. It includes those with a degree, those with a higher degree( postgraduates) and those with other qualifications.
The graph provides information about how much people earned per week based on their education level and age in the year 2002.
Overall, those with other qualifications had the highest income on average, meanwhile, people with first degrees made less money than the other two categories. Furthermore, the gap between the youngest and the eldest in their income was significant.
There are two clear trends visible, employees with other qualifications, in general, made much more money than their counterparts. Starting with above 400 pounds at age 21-25, this figure increased sharply and hit its peak at the age 36-40, with over 800 pounds per week. However, from age 40 to 60, the figure saw a steady drop to under 700 pounds. Likewise, first degrees graduates employees started with lower salaries (around 350 pounds) then soared strongly to almost 700 pounds at age 36-40 and 41-45. After reaching its peak, the number decreased mildly to about the same point with other qualifications graduates employees at age 56-60. In general, the main difference between the two types of employees was the fact that other type qualifications made 100 pounds weekly more than first degree employees.
On the other hand, staff with higher degrees received less money than those with other qualifications from the age 21 to 55. At age 21-25, the wage was just below 400 pounds then raised to almost 750 pounds at the 41-45 demographic. The figure suddenly soared up to under 800 pounds after it experienced a slight drop from age 45 to 55.
- The diagram below shows how salt is removed from sea water to make it drinkable 78
- The line graph below shows the number of people in Great Britain living alone by age from 1996 to 2012 54
- The graph below shows the changing patterns of access to modern technology in homes in the UK 78
- Traffic congestion is becoming increasingly problematic in major cities What solution can you suggest to solve the problems 89
- The graph below shows the changing patterns of access to modern technology in homes in the UK 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 42, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...he graph provides information about how much people earned per week based on their e...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, likewise, so, then, while, in general, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1281.0 965.302439024 133% => OK
No of words: 255.0 196.424390244 130% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02352941176 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60607045751 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 106.607317073 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537254901961 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 360.0 283.868780488 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.7519469696 43.030603864 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.75 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.25 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.41666666667 5.23603664747 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.325472078866 0.215688989381 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127147554033 0.103423049105 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.123572790507 0.0843802449381 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198274302878 0.15604864568 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0651095899856 0.0819641961636 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.46 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.