The graph shows changes in the prices per kilogram of various types of bread in Europe between 2001 and 2005

Essay topics:

The graph shows changes in the prices per kilogram of various types of bread in Europe between 2001 and 2005

The given line graph compares and contrasts data on the cost of 4 different bread in Europe over the period from 2001 to 2005.
As can be seen from the chart, there was a fluctuation in the figure of white bread and rye while the price of brown and wholemeal remained the same.
In 2001, the cost of white bread is the lowest, it was about 0.1 euro per kilogram. However, this figure increased significantly and reach the highest point of 1.2 euro in 2002, after that, it decreased and then bounce back in 2004. Despite of the highest position in 2001, rye was passed by white bread in 2002, however, it increased significantly and peak at 1.1 in 2005.
While the cost of brown increased slight from 0.5 to nearly 0.6, this figure of wholemeal, was sold in Europe, maintained the same level during 4 years from 2001 to 2005.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-06-07 ngha201005 67 view
2020-04-06 Beautiful woman 67 view
2018-12-21 Nguyen Hai Viet 61 view
Essays by user Nguyen Hai Viet :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 131, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e while the price of brown and wholemeal remained the same. In 2001, the cost of...
^^
Line 3, column 192, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...oint of 1.2 euro in 2002, after that, it decreased and then bounce back in 2004. ...
^^
Line 3, column 375, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... significantly and peak at 1.1 in 2005. While the cost of brown increased slight...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, then, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 677.0 965.302439024 70% => OK
No of words: 151.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.48344370861 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.50545371207 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34064507322 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 84.0 106.607317073 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.556291390728 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 189.9 283.868780488 67% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.2192742168 43.030603864 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.833333333 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1666666667 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 5.23603664747 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205728391298 0.215688989381 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114721724213 0.103423049105 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0805485778301 0.0843802449381 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124882369051 0.15604864568 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0634175325068 0.0819641961636 77% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.48 61.2550243902 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.0 11.4140731707 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.39 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 24.0 40.7170731707 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.