The graph shows children by age group as percentage of the young population in the United Kingdom between 1990 and 2001

Essay topics:

The graph shows children by age group as percentage of the young population in the United Kingdom between 1990 and 2001.

The rendered line graphs illustrates that the percentage of the young children by their age group in the United States between 1990 and 2001 year.

It can be clearly seen that the most striking feature in the graph was nearly zero to four year children with the highest percentage in 1992. The 0-4 age group children percentage starts from approximately 26% in 1990 and in 1992 it is notified to be a 26.5% and by following the downward trend it reached at 23.5% at the end year 2001. Moreover, the percentage of 5-9 year children was starts from 24.5% and in 1998 it was witnessed with 26.2%. In 2001 the population was decreased at 25%.

Moving ahead, the percentage of the 10-14 year old children was 23.2% in 1990 and it was notified to be a 24.7% in 1993. By following the upward trend it reached at 26% in 2001. Therefore, the percentage of 15-19 year old children was 26% in 1990 and it was decreased at 23% in 1995. In 2001 the percentage of children climbed at 25%.

Overall, 0-4 year old child was notified to be a highest figure in the provided graph. However, 15-19 year old child was notified to be a lowest figure in the provided graph.

Votes
Average: 8.5 (6 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-05-03 chinh11111 78 view
2023-03-04 Rohan111 view
2023-03-04 Rohan111 view
2021-10-10 stanie calitex 89 view
2019-10-23 MaganpreetSingh 85 view
Essays by user MaganpreetSingh :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 48, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
..., 0-4 year old child was notified to be a highest figure in the provided graph. H...
^
Line 13, column 137, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...15-19 year old child was notified to be a lowest figure in the provided graph.
^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, therefore

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 7.0 229% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 955.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 211.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.52606635071 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46300540672 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 87.0 106.607317073 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.412322274882 0.547539520022 75% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 250.2 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.62499852 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.8181818182 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1818181818 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.90909090909 5.23603664747 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.296590473717 0.215688989381 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.147743894186 0.103423049105 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.133752965904 0.0843802449381 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.244396703185 0.15604864568 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.180129530811 0.0819641961636 220% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 13.2329268293 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 86.03 61.2550243902 140% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.3012195122 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 8.99 11.4140731707 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.37 8.06136585366 79% => OK
difficult_words: 24.0 40.7170731707 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.