Some people think that only staff who worked in company for a long time should be promoted to higher positions. What is your opinion on this? Give reasons and relevant examples?
The current topic of many individuals opine that the workers who work in an organization for a maximum period of time they should get supporter to the upper levels. It can be further explained through careful consideration which will intimately evaluate the topic. I would like to put forth the case that will provide a detailed account in the upcoming paragraphs.
To embark with, there are myriad of reasons in flavor of my stance. The most conspicuous one is that the staff who work for a company for long time and they should get promotions because they are more experience in that workplace and they will get motivation by getting this. It can be further started with great degree of evaluation that it will be beneficial for both company and staff because by getting this the employs can do their work with more dedication. To be more precise, if a company do not give the promotion to the staff then they will leave that workplace and get job in another one this will not be good for a company. For instance, recently a survey is conducted in that most of the workplaces develop and the workers of that workplace do hard work by getting promotions.
Certainly, the sinister side of this issue is that giving promotions is not always good for the company. Additionally, it can be further supported that nowadays the new employs are more educated. If company take the new workers on higher posts and they have new tackiness of doing work. Also, they workplace will be developed.
However, in my view the older workers should get higher rank in the same workplace because they are more experience of that work.
In the view of arguments outlined above, one can conclude that despite having some concerns the role of promotions is instrumental indeed. Notwithstanding, its potential drawbacks should not be overlooked either.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-22 | MaganpreetSingh | 73 | view |
- Despite of better access to education why adults are not able to read or write How government can help in the scenario 74
- Doing an enjoyable activity, a child can develop better skills and more creativity than reading. To what extent do you agree? 78
- Some people think that money is the best gift for teenagers while other disagrees. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 56
- Some people think that only staff who worked in company for a long time should be promoted to higher positions. What is your opinion on this? Give reasons and relevant examples? 73
- The graph shows children by age group as percentage of the young population in the United Kingdom between 1990 and 2001 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 104, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...o work in an organization for a maximum period of time they should get supporter to the upper ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 791, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ace do hard work by getting promotions. Certainly, the sinister side of this iss...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, look, so, then, for instance, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1535.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88853503185 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70050361707 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.477707006369 0.561755894193 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 477.0 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.6185466192 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.333333333 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9333333333 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.93333333333 7.06120827912 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261155716012 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0896521540803 0.084324248473 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.061446064771 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135432017117 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0600092706316 0.056905535591 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.