The graph shows the number of visitors to four international museums between 1980 and 2015.
The given line graph compares four different international museums in terms of the number of visitors over the period of 35 years.
Overall, it is clear that the Louvre is by far the most visited museum throughout the period shown. Also, while the number of people, who visited “Louvre” and “Vatican Museums” museums rose gradually , the number of L. S. Museum visitors fall steadily. Interestingly, the figure for Shenzhen Museum remained the same both at the beginning and at the end of the period.
Looking at the graph in more detail, in 1980, the number of visitors of Louvre museum was just under 8 million and rose by approximately two million by the end of the given trend, while the figure for Vatican Museums started the period about 4.8 million and two folded over the same period.
In 1980, the figure for L. S. Museum was just above 4 million and from 1980 to 1985, the trend witnessed a plateau, then dipped steadily by half in 2015. Between 1980 and 2000, the number of Shenzhen Museum visitors declined by around a million, from 2000 onwards, the trend reversed.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-19 | M10 | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-15 | Phạm Minh Hân | 87 | view |
| 2023-08-15 | Phạm Minh Hân | 84 | view |
| 2022-12-21 | kevann | 56 | view |
| 2022-11-01 | quaan_ne | 78 | view |
- The line graph gives information about the number of Iranian Greek and Turkish students who enrolled at Sheffield University between 2005 and 2009 78
- The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years 67
- The given line graph below illustrates the number of people moved from rural to urban areas of three different countries 78
- The table below shows the percentage participation of women in senior management in three companies between 1975 and 2015 73
- The graph below shows the number of hours per day on average that children spent watching television between 1950 and 2010
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 200, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...“Vatican Museums” museums rose gradually , the number of L. S. Museum visitors fal...
^^
Line 7, column 286, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... from 2000 onwards, the trend reversed.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, look, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 909.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83510638298 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51216351746 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.515957446809 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 258.3 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.9054591928 43.030603864 167% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.0 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8888888889 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.44444444444 5.23603664747 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.374539620321 0.215688989381 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.162038375285 0.103423049105 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0858475326149 0.0843802449381 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.237939671631 0.15604864568 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0645999908596 0.0819641961636 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.