The graph shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country .
The given line graph illustrates the percentage of four various materials, which were recycled in a specific country between 1982 to2010 including paper and cardboard, glass containers, aluminum cans, and plastics.
In general, there was a noticeable increase in recycling rates for all materials throughout the period. However, paper and cardboard consistently showed highest rates of recycling compared to other materials. In 1982, cardboard had a recycling rate of around 65%, while glass containers stood at approximately 50%. Glass containers experienced a minor decline of 10% in 1986 before steadily rising thereafter. Similarly, paper and cardboard witnessed a fluctuation reaching its peak at 80%in 1990beforedeclining.
On the other hand, aluminum cans and plastics had remarkable lower recycling rates, both of them were blow 5%. Nonetheless, both materials displayed an upward trajectory, with aluminum cans surpassing plastics by the end of the period.
From the graph we can see that overall, it is apparent that the percentage of four recycled materials raised over the period. Nevertheless, paper and cardboard were most recycled over the years compared to rest of the materials.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 147, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'showed the highest'.
Suggestion: showed the highest
...wever, paper and cardboard consistently showed highest rates of recycling compared to other ma...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 103, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'blowed', 'blown'.
Suggestion: blowed; blown
...ower recycling rates, both of them were blow 5%. Nonetheless, both materials display...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, nevertheless, nonetheless, similarly, while, in general, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1027.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.70555555556 4.92477711251 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15177296763 2.65546596893 119% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627777777778 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 299.7 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.2296554301 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.7 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.7 5.23603664747 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245512613158 0.215688989381 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0916604631336 0.103423049105 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.072553043801 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153609734665 0.15604864568 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0647618444404 0.0819641961636 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 61.2550243902 73% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.54 11.4140731707 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.