The graphs below show the numbers of male and female workers in 1975 and 1995 in several employment sectors of the Republic of Freedonia.

Essay topics:

The graphs below show the numbers of male and female workers in 1975 and 1995 in several employment sectors of the Republic of Freedonia.

Overall, from the fleeting glance, it is vivid that the most striking feature was the number of males was predominant in 1975 in all six employment sectors, whereas, this trend changed in the 1995, females became ahead in the sector of communication and wholesale and retail trade and almost equal in the sector of finance.

it can be distinctly seen that, from the 1975 to 1995, the number of males and females remained same in the job sector of manufacturing and public sector was approximately 650 and 840 respectively. In the department of communication, the volume of male was still constant in given time but the volume of females increased from 230 to reached at 580 in 1995.

Probing ahead, by 1995, in the wholesale departments, employment females experienced raised in number as compared to males and the number of males in the department was unwavering. Furthermore,In 1975, in the finance sector proportion of females was less after that in 1995 which witnessed upward trend and stood at 450 which was almost similar to male proportion. Lastly, the number of females just 10 in number in 1975, which shot up and reached at 100 ,on the other hand, slight decrease in male number in the public sector.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-09 xgracetangx 73 view
2019-12-29 Adeola Nafisat 67 view
2019-11-17 kalkipriya Muruganantham 67 view
2019-10-21 NeutronnzZ 84 view
2019-08-31 Nishanthini Jegatheesan 67 view
Essays by user Kang pari :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...ost equal in the sector of finance. it can be distinctly seen that, from the 1...
^^
Line 5, column 193, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , In
...e department was unwavering. Furthermore,In 1975, in the finance sector proportion ...
^^^
Line 5, column 455, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...n 1975, which shot up and reached at 100 ,on the other hand, slight decrease in ma...
^^
Line 5, column 513, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d, slight decrease in male number in the public sector.
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, lastly, still, whereas, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1011.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88405797101 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78110701562 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.507246376812 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 298.8 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 34.0 22.4926829268 151% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.0845096459 43.030603864 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 168.5 112.824112599 149% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.5 22.9334400587 150% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.83333333333 5.23603664747 188% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.340598861852 0.215688989381 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.19755897971 0.103423049105 191% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0562214782898 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.250177374732 0.15604864568 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0442352298351 0.0819641961636 54% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.8 13.2329268293 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.89 61.2550243902 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.62 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.6 10.9970731707 142% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 11.0658536585 172% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.