The graphs below show the post-school qualifications held by Australians in the age groups 25 to 34 and 55 to 69.

Essay topics:

The graphs below show the post-school qualifications held by Australians in the age groups 25 to 34 and 55 to 69.

The two pie charts represent the post-school qualifications of groups between 25-34 and 55-69, it is categorised into 10 sectors. Before we start, we can look up that Social science and Arts are top ranked among the both generations.

To begin with, Administration follow by social science and arts in the generations. On the contrary, architecture and medicine decreased with younger one. Compare with that, older graduates slightly drop by 1.5% at architecture and 4% at medicine. However, the biggest decline with engineering is from 19% to 9.36%. Main subjects;science,maths and computers are quiet raised in between 20s graduates. Additionally, education has minor rises with 1% and adminstration lead a moderate growth with the percentage of nearly 5%.

In conclusion, the demand of social science and arts are mainly preferrable according to the post-school qualified license which is held in Australia. Also, each age groups has some of the similarities per subjects.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 32, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (Administration) must be used with a third-person verb: 'follows'.
Suggestion: follows
...ons. To begin with, Administration follow by social science and arts in the gener...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 339, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , maths
...from 19% to 9.36%. Main subjects;science,maths and computers are quiet raised in betwe...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 179, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...in Australia. Also, each age groups has some of the similarities per subjects.
^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, look, so, in conclusion, on the contrary, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 830.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 152.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46052631579 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51124308557 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.39379321851 2.65546596893 128% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.690789473684 0.547539520022 126% => OK
syllable_count: 241.2 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.5651954464 43.030603864 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.0 112.824112599 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.2 22.9334400587 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4 5.23603664747 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167858704955 0.215688989381 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0576377351885 0.103423049105 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108029961007 0.0843802449381 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132518500105 0.15604864568 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0977934437087 0.0819641961636 119% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.8 11.4140731707 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.