line chart
The table, combined with the line chart, give an overall view about how people from four age groups visited cinema over the span of 8 years.
As can be seen from the table, the proportion of attendance was relatively high, remaining around 70 percent during the given period, while the times they frequented cinema reduced slightly from 10.7 times to 8.3 times per year.
Regarding the line, it is noticeable that the number of 14-24 year olds group fluctuated at the largest extent, although reaching a plateau at nearly 14 times in the first 2 years. However, it then fell down to a bottom at only a half in 1998, after which it slighted climbed again, finishing at 10 times. Similarly, the line of 25-34 year olds people fluctuated with the same pattern, starting from 10 times and then declined to approximately 9 times. People who were more than 50 years old paid more visits than those who aged 35-49, chasing closely to the second position at the end with nearly 9 times. 35-49 year olds group came last, finishing at only over 5 times in 2002.
Overall, young people had the most number of visits to cinema, while cinema goers reduced their frequency over time.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-09-05 | nobitaa | 73 | view |
| 2024-08-26 | khanhkhanhlhp | 84 | view |
| 2024-08-26 | khanhkhanhlhp | 84 | view |
| 2024-07-24 | nobitaa | 73 | view |
| 2024-07-08 | Vicky_2702 | 67 | view |
- line chart 78
- Nowadays, some employers think that formal academic qualifications are more important than life experience or personal qualities when they look for new employees. Why is it the case? Is it a positive or negative development? 84
- table 84
- Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not local people. Why is this the case and what can be done to attract more local people to visit these places? 84
- Given high unemployment rate, it is recommended that the government only provide primary education and no secondary education. What do you think? 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, regarding, second, similarly, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 973.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 206.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72330097087 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.27041798204 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 106.607317073 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.635922330097 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 282.6 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.07073170732 467% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.0332357022 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.625 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.75 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.125 5.23603664747 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.103500669453 0.215688989381 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0503111174085 0.103423049105 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0759999775583 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0710386454694 0.15604864568 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0920795651418 0.0819641961636 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.