Nowadays, some employers think that formal academic qualifications are more important than life experience or personal qualities when they look for new employees. Why is it the case? Is it a positive or negative development?
It is true that employing is of paramount importance for an organization, and employers today tend to pay more attention to candidates who possess academic qualifications rather than life experience and qualities. This viewpoint, which will be discussed below, is attributed to several reasons, and has more drawbacks than benefits.
Recruiters’ preference of formal academic qualifications is rooted in the fact that learners are trained and practiced while gaining specialized knowledge for a given career. They thus having a better ability and crucial skills to work without being trained and guided. This view is true in knowledge-based jobs such as doctors, lawyers, teachers who must have enough career-related knowledge and skills. Otherwise they could barely diagnose a symptom, defend the accused or pass knowledge to their students. Choosing qualified candidates, therefore, helps employers to have their jobs finished appropriately, saving their time of retrain.
Knowledge alone, however, could not guarantee the overall quality of an employee. Coming fresh out of school, the lack of life experience makes students struggle to find ways of dealing with problems, socializing with others or determining their career path. As a result, they easily end up giving the jobs or being fired as serving no value to the organization. Equally important is one’s qualities as it determines whether his or her work is morality-oriented or not. An immoral worker, for instance, shows no hesitation to cheat and harm their colleagues, or even create products regardless or users’ well-being. Eventually, the companies would suffer from their negative consequences.
To recap, it seems that recruiters’ inclination towards qualifications makes them fail to find moral and experienced employees, not only leading to time-consuming recruitment but even organization’ destruction.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-11 | trần ngọc tuấn | 67 | view |
| 2023-11-27 | ophongcute@gmail.com | 84 | view |
| 2023-09-01 | Afdalah Harris | 73 | view |
| 2023-04-02 | anhminhbnvn1 | 78 | view |
| 2022-10-09 | linhdung01 | 50 | view |
- a table shows monthly expenditure of an Australian family in 1991 and in 2001 84
- Some people believe that the only purpose of films is to entertain. Others say films should have educational value. Discuss both view and give your opinion. 89
- People cart eat a wide variety of food that can be grown in other areas. As a result, people eat more food produced in other regions than local food. Do you think the advantages of this trend outweigh the disadvantages? 89
- The chart shows average distances that people in England travelled using different forms of transport in the years 1985 and 2000.It is clear that the total number of miles travelled by English people using all modes of transport increased significantly be 73
- process 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 411, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Otherwise,
...gh career-related knowledge and skills. Otherwise they could barely diagnose a symptom, d...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 364, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Equally,
...s serving no value to the organization. Equally important is one's qualities as it...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for instance, such as, as a result, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1639.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.85357142857 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.41753431824 2.80592935109 122% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.667857142857 0.561755894193 119% => OK
syllable_count: 486.9 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.2401753908 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.071428571 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181704265899 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.055105712526 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0602009107574 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108144047955 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0721286106094 0.056905535591 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.65 12.4159519038 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.32 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.