The line chart details the proportion of residents living in Australia in millions from different regions between 1976 and 2011.
The line graph compares the distribution of Australian citizens coming from the United Kingdom, Asian countries, and others with a total in percentage over 35 years, commencing in 1976
From a general perspective, there was a marked similar trend in Other and total proportion at first glance, which fluctuated moderately throughout the period. It can also be claimed that the year 1991 witnessed a significant point at which the rate of Asia, the Uk and Others are equal before reversing its orders.
In terms of Britain and Asian countries, while a considerable rise can be seen in Asia percentage, the opposite was true for the UK, which declines gradually over time. Specifically, the former stood at roughly 5 percent in 1976 before climbing to a peak at exactly 15 percent at the end of the period. In contrast, approximately 15 and 5 percent of the latter was noticed in the initial year compared to 2011, respectively.
Turning to the Others and Total ratio, both of them showed the same variation. In detail, Starting at over 10 percent in the first year, Others features dropped to 7 percent over a decade, which subsequently recovered to the highest record at 14 percent in 2006. Almost identical to others, the total group percentage surged to 25 percent after hitting the lowest point at under 20 percent in 1996, 20 years from the starting point.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-03-01 | denistran85 | 90 | view |
| 2021-05-31 | chathurika2008@gmail.com | 78 | view |
| 2021-05-31 | chathurika2008@gmail.com | 89 | view |
| 2021-05-27 | bachduong123 | 73 | view |
| 2021-05-27 | bachduong123 | 87 | view |
- The table below show information and predictions regarding the change in percentage of the population aged 65 and above in three countries 89
- The line chart details the proportion of residents living in Australia in millions from different regions between 1976 and 2011 11
- Some students work while studying This often results in lacking time for education and constantly feeling under pressure What do you think are the causes of this What solutions can you suggest 80
- The line chart details the proportion of residents living in Australia in millions from different regions between 1976 and 2011 73
- Many governments think that economic progress is their most important goal Some people however think that other types of progress are equally important for a country Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 84
Comments
ultra pixel survive is a…
ultra pixel survive is a free survival adventure game in which you play as a hero and defeat monsters, build structures, and try to survive as long as you can. It supports PC, Android, and iOS devices.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The line graph compares the distribution...
^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tage over 35 years, commencing in 1976 From a general perspective, there was a ...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...are equal before reversing its orders. In terms of Britain and Asian countries,...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l year compared to 2011, respectively. Turning to the Others and Total ratio, b...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1135.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 231.0 196.424390244 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91341991342 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77793256817 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 106.607317073 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575757575758 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 339.3 283.868780488 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 73.8265492557 43.030603864 172% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.875 112.824112599 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.875 22.9334400587 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.23603664747 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0699293699615 0.215688989381 32% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0289556991271 0.103423049105 28% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0349834312692 0.0843802449381 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0508619862799 0.15604864568 33% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0271787486719 0.0819641961636 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.79 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.61 8.06136585366 119% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 40.7170731707 165% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.