The line graph above gives information on average price of a barrel of oil and the food price index from 2000 to 2011.
It is evident that a dramatic increase in both commodity price was seen over period shown. Furthermore, the trend for both commodities were similar, so a strong correlation is suggested.
In 2000, the index of food price was about 90 points. The same pattern can be seen for oil price, just below $30 per barrel. Over following four years, both prices did not change too much, even decreased in period 2012-2013, before jumping up significantly between 2004 and 2007. By 2007, the average of oil price had more than double to nearly $60 per barrel, food price rose by around 50 points.
In 2008, average global prices of both oil and food rose suddenly, with oil price reaching a peak of approximately $130, world food index reaching to 220 points. By 2009, the figure for both commodities fall significantly, at $40 for average oil prices and 140 points for food price index, before rising one again in 2011. By 2011, oil cost reached at $100 per barrel, while index of food price peaked at 240 points.
The line graph above gives information on average price of a barrel of oil and the food price index from 2000 to 2011.
It is evident that a dramatic increase in both commodity price was seen over period shown. Furthermore, the trend for both commodities were similar, so a strong correlation is suggested.
In 2000, the index of food price was about 90 points. The same pattern can be seen for oil price, just below $30 per barrel. Over following four years, both prices did not change too much, even decreased in period 2012-2013, before jumping up significantly between 2004 and 2007. By 2007, the average of oil price had more than double to nearly $60 per barrel, food price rose by around 50 points.
In 2008, average global prices of both oil and food rose suddenly, with oil price reaching a peak of approximately $130, world food index reaching to 220 points. By 2009, the figure for both commodities fall significantly, at $40 for average oil prices and 140 points for food price index, before rising one again in 2011. By 2011, oil cost reached at $100 per barrel, while index of food price peaked at 240 points.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-23 | Yogbelieve01 | 11 | view |
| 2018-06-28 | kimloantt | 78 | view |
- The bar chart shows information about people’s drinking behavior by age group in the US. Severaltrends areevident.The highest proportion of those who never drink (nearly two-thirds) was in the 16 to 24 yearsgroup. The proportion tended to decrease with 56
- The line chart above compares waste products in tonnes among 3 companies A, B and C from 2000 to 2005.It can be seen from the graph that company A and B tended to produce less waste than they used to by the beginning. On the other hand, company C’s rate 67
- The line chart above gives information on the figure for British city workers travelling every day to work by the three common kinds of transport from 1970 to 2030.It is clear from the graph that the quickly rising number of people who went and will go to 73
- The graph gives information about average price of a barrel of oil and the food price index from 2000 to 2011.It is clear that a dramatic increase in both commodity price was seen over period shown. Furthermore, the trend for both commodities were similar 78
- The table above compares the percentage of children with different educational problems in school A and school B in 2005 and 2015.It is clear from the table that the total percentage of students who were lack of educational abilities of school B was small 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 10, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'graphs'.
Suggestion: graphs
The line graph above gives information on average pric...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 926.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.65326633166 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45398036789 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582914572864 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 267.3 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 3.36585365854 297% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.6775839989 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.6 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.6 5.23603664747 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.652666873176 0.215688989381 303% => The coherence between essay topic and essay body is overfitting.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.292466160106 0.103423049105 283% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.153961937356 0.0843802449381 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.451065592668 0.15604864568 289% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.098244209267 0.0819641961636 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.69 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.96 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.