The line graph below shows the oil production and consumption in China between 1982 and 2006.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The presented line graph represents the comparison between the oil yielded and its usage throughout the China from years 1982 to 2006, in millions of oil barrels per day.
A glance at this data can figure out some striking points, such as oil has been used extravagantly by the country with respect to its development in production capacity. Thus, outracing the production capacity.
It can be seen that the oil production capacity of China upsurged in 1986 to 3 million oil barrels per day from 2.1 million barrels in 1982. This rate of increment in its production could have fulfilled the upcoming demand, but, after that, the amount of oil yielded per day stayed stable, almost for the next 8 years. However, this figure grew steadily over the remaining period and submitted at about 3.5 million barrels of oil per day in 2006.
In contrast to this, the usage of oil barrels per day was constant from 1982 to 1990, just below 2 million barrels of oil. But for the next four years, the consumption rate climbed up noticeably to 3.5 million barrels, multiplied by almost 1.75 times, thus outracing the production capacity. Afterward, the usage rate did not come down but in fact increased further, reaching as high as 6.4 million barrels per day at the end of the period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-06-26 | Kiwi | view | |
| 2022-06-26 | Kiwi | 73 | view |
| 2021-09-10 | Hamza khan1 | 61 | view |
| 2021-08-28 | Sayansh Garg | 84 | view |
| 2021-08-22 | Sayansh Garg | 73 | view |
- Write about the following topic Buying things on the Internet such as books air tickets and groceries is becoming more and more popular Do the advantages of shopping in this way outweigh the disadvantages Give reasons for your answer and include any relev 89
- The line graph below shows the oil production and consumption in China between 1982 and 2006 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The plans below show a student room for two people and a student room for one person at an Australian university Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The table below shows the sales made by a coffee shop in an office building on a typical weekday Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The graphs below show the enrolments of overseas students and local students in Australian universities over a ten year period Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, so, thus, in contrast, in fact, such as, in contrast to, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1061.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 221.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80090497738 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52929439014 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565610859729 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 300.6 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.0706166784 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.888888889 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5555555556 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.55555555556 5.23603664747 182% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171018867288 0.215688989381 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0850391746656 0.103423049105 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0719007742824 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131033967756 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0782620109028 0.0819641961636 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.