Line graph : Consumption of fast food by Australian teenagers.
The figure elucidates the number of fast food consumption by Australian adolescents from 1975 to 2000. At first glance, it is evident that the most noticeable changes occurred for the amount of fish and chips consumption, and it is measured in number of times eaten per year.
To begin with, there was a tremendous upsurge for the total consumption for hamburgers and pizza. 1975 to 2000 witnessed a dramatic growth for the number of hamburgers consumption in which it stood at well beneath 20 in 1975 and sharply finished at just above 100 in 2000. Moreover, following the same pattern as hamburgers, the amount consumption for pizza uplifted enormously between 1975, which was at well under 20, and 1995, which made up at just over 80. Nevertheless, over the following 5 years, it remained stable.
In contrast, in the first 10 years, the number of fish and chip consumptions experienced a gradual wave in which it achieved at well across 80 in 1985, erratically, the amount of these food consumptions plunged, plummeting to just less than 40 by the end of the period shown.
- In many countries, a small number of people earn extremely high salaries. Some people believe that this is good for the country, but others think that governments should not allow salaries above a certain level. Discuss both these views and give your own 73
- some people think newspaper is the most effective way to obtain the latest information because it has more influence than other forms of media. 56
- some people think newspaper is the most effective way to obtain the latest information because it has more influence than other forms of media 72
- Nowadays many people work part or full time from home. Some people say that working from home has many benefits while others disagree. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 61
- The maps : summarise the changes to Liverpool john moores university from 2010 to 2016. 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, moreover, nevertheless, well, in contrast, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 899.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88586956522 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84798684412 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576086956522 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 251.1 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.5922714153 43.030603864 155% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.428571429 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2857142857 22.9334400587 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.57142857143 5.23603664747 183% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136867130007 0.215688989381 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0771753780044 0.103423049105 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0976260745308 0.0843802449381 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109648012512 0.15604864568 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0453486040259 0.0819641961636 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.