Line graph : Consumption of fast food by Australian teenagers.
The line graph exhibits the amount of consumption of fast food pizza, humbergers, and fish and chips, which were consumed by Australian teenagers from 1979 to 2000. Overall, consumption of pizza , fish and chips saw asurge, while consumption of pizza slump over the period presented.
Regarding the consumption of fast food involving pizza, there began higher than consumption of hamburger, fish and chips, with a whopping 300 grams per week in 1970. This number plunged considerably to almost 200 grams per week in 1990.
Turning to the consumption of fish and chips was higher than consumption of hamburgers, with nearly 80 grams per week in 1970. Before escalating dramatically to almost 500 grams per week in 1990, the quantity of consumption of fish and chips was shrink, hit 150 grams per week in 1980. Between 1970 and 1990, there was a noticeable soared in the amount of consumption of fish and chips
- The line graph illustrates the consumption of 3 kinds of spreads(Margarine, Low fat & reduced spreads, and Butter) between 1981 and 2007. 67
- Line graph Consumption of fast food by Australian teenagers 53
- the graph below shows the number of members at agolf club and tennis club from 2005 to 2015. 84
- The line graph illustrates the consumption of 3 kinds of spreads Margarine Low fat reduced spreads and Butter between 1981 and 2007 44
- The line graph below shows the number of single-family homes constructed in the United States by region over a period of six years.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting in the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 70, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mount of consumption of fast food pizza, humbergers, and fish and chips, which w...
^^
Line 1, column 83, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...umption of fast food pizza, humbergers, and fish and chips, which were consumed ...
^^
Line 1, column 197, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...9 to 2000. Overall, consumption of pizza , fish and chips saw asurge, while consum...
^^
Line 1, column 287, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... pizza slump over the period presented. Regarding the consumption of fast food i...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 238, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y to almost 200 grams per week in 1990. Turning to the consumption of fish and c...
^^^^
Line 5, column 93, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...her than consumption of hamburgers, with nearly 80 grams per week in 1970. Before...
^^
Line 5, column 213, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... grams per week in 1990, the quantity of consumption of fish and chips was shrink...
^^
Line 5, column 334, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...en 1970 and 1990, there was a noticeable soared in the amount of consumption of ...
^^
Line 5, column 359, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...as a noticeable soared in the amount of consumption of fish and chips
^^
Line 5, column 390, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...amount of consumption of fish and chips
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
regarding, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 763.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 152.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01973684211 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51124308557 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74422644115 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 77.0 106.607317073 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.506578947368 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 200.7 283.868780488 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.708231902 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.0 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7142857143 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.85714285714 5.23603664747 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 10.0 1.69756097561 589% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238961301618 0.215688989381 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125181425665 0.103423049105 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117788341888 0.0843802449381 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18238002562 0.15604864568 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0994613510299 0.0819641961636 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.