The line graph shows the global demand for different textile fibers between 1980 and 2015. Units are measured in million tonnes.
Given is the line graph depicting the changes in gobal’s fibers consumption during a 35-year phase, commencing from 1980. Units are measured in million tonnes.
Perceptibly, there was an upward trend in the amount of polyester, cotton and cellulosic consumption while the opposite was true with it of wool.
Starting from 5 and 13 in the first year, the volume of polyester and cotton escalated sharply and crossed at 20 in 1995, After crossing, the amount of polyester witnessed a dramatic surge and reached the zenith of 69 which was the first rank in 2015, meanwhile, this number in cotton was recorded to inch up slightly and end at 31.
When it comes to the figure of cellulosic consumption, from 4 tons this number was recognized to plateau from 4 to 2; however, until 2000, there was an upward tendency and it hit the point at 10. Turning to the volume of wool used which was the smallest number among textile fibers in 2015 with just 2, this number was recorded to oscillate between 1 to 5 during that phase.
- The pictures below show the process of making clothes from recycled plastic bottles Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The picture shows the process of making wool Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The maps give information about a university sports court 73
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- The graph and table below show the average monthly temperatures and the average number of hours of sunshine per year in three major cities Summarize the information by selectin and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 145, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...encing from 1980. Units are measured in million tonnes. Perceptibly, there was an upwa...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 842.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.67777777778 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55739064548 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583333333333 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 241.2 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 88.9188144071 43.030603864 207% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 140.333333333 112.824112599 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.0 22.9334400587 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 5.23603664747 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116428668126 0.215688989381 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0882291458078 0.103423049105 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0924768454767 0.0843802449381 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0846051686161 0.15604864568 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100661125119 0.0819641961636 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.2329268293 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.41 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.46 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.