The line graph shows the global demand of different types of textile from 1980 to 2015.
The line chart given illustrates total textile demand over the world between 1980 and 2015.
Overall, polyester experienced the most significant change over the period given. It is worth noting that the figures for polyester, cotton and cellulosic fluctuated in an increasing trend, while the opposite was true for wool.
In 1980, the demand for cotton was nearly 15 million tons, which was around triple that of polyester. Then, the figure of cotton fluctuated from 1980 to 2002 and generally rose by around 8 million tons. Similarly, the total polyester demand underwent a fluctuation in an increasing trend to about 32 million tons in 2000. After that, while the figure of cotton wet=nt up gradually to 32 million tons in 2015, that of polyester rose dramatically and reached a peak of approximately 70 million tons the same year.
Regarding the remaining types of textile, the demand for cellulosic and wool were almost the same at about 3 million tons in 1980. From this year to 1990, there was almost no change in both figures. After falling marginally, the demand for cellulosic increased slowly by 7 million tons between 1990 and 2015. In contrast, the figure of wool rose insignificantly before decreasing gradually to nearly 1 million tons in 2015.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 426, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ually to nearly 1 million tons in 2015.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, similarly, then, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1066.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 209.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1004784689 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6985561098 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535885167464 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 306.0 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.7198480502 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.9090909091 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.54545454545 5.23603664747 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168999065052 0.215688989381 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0772907849141 0.103423049105 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0749497356903 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130014938614 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10118290258 0.0819641961636 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.53 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.