The line graph shows the percentage of different age groups of cinema visitors in a particular country.
The line chart compares the percentages of movie goers by different age groups in a country from 1978 to 2008.
Overall, the differences in the percentages of cinema visitors among these four age cohorts finally narrow down over the twenty year period. What is noteworthy is the significant increase in the number of people aged over 50.
The upper three curves representing cinema visitors aged 14 to 24, 25 to 34, and 35 to 49 respectively. These three curves all show a general decline over the 20 years. The percentages of people aged 14 to 24 and 35 to 49, as represented by the upper first and the third curve, were each down by about 10%, compared with what they were at 90% and 60% in 1978. As for the age cohort 25 to 34, the figure for it dropped from 80% to only about 65%. By contrast, more people aged over 50 showed up in cinema in the period, as the figure rose from 40% to 50%.
One interesting point is that all the four curves hit the lowest point in 1988, with the figure at 75%, 60%, 40%, and 20% respectively. Another noteworthy point is the period between 1998 to 2003 when the percentages of movie goers came to an standstill.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-27 | hoang tuan minh | 67 | view |
| 2023-01-27 | hoang tuan minh | 67 | view |
| 2023-01-27 | hoang tuan minh | 67 | view |
| 2023-01-27 | hoang tuan minh | 67 | view |
| 2022-01-18 | lollipop423 | 78 | view |
- The line graph shows the percentage of different age groups of cinema visitors in a particular country 78
- The line graph below shows the production of paper wood pulp and sawn wood in the UK from 1980 to 2000 75
- The line graph shows the percentage of different age groups of cinema visitors in a particular country 73
- Higher education could be funded in three ways All costs paid by government all costs paid by students or students paying all costs through a government loan What are the advantages of these choices 73
- The chart illustrates the consumption of three kinds of fast food by teenagers in Mauritius from 1985 to 2015 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 241, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
... the percentages of movie goers came to an standstill.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, still, third, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 946.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 213.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.44131455399 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.482267558 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544600938967 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 275.4 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.6483283389 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.6 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.270287387993 0.215688989381 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107887449768 0.103423049105 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0986557914941 0.0843802449381 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18188840699 0.15604864568 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111616765109 0.0819641961636 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.47 11.4140731707 74% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.61 8.06136585366 82% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 241, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
... the percentages of movie goers came to an standstill.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, still, third, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 946.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 213.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.44131455399 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.482267558 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544600938967 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 275.4 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.6483283389 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.6 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.270287387993 0.215688989381 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107887449768 0.103423049105 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0986557914941 0.0843802449381 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18188840699 0.15604864568 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111616765109 0.0819641961636 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.47 11.4140731707 74% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.61 8.06136585366 82% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.