The line graph shows the percentage of New Zealand population from 1950 to 2050.
The line graph illustrates the proportion of New Zealand population in different aged groups from 1950 to the present and projection to 2050.
Overall, the number of people aged 35-64 and over 65 show upward trends with former being projected to the most popular group by 2050. While two remaining groups from 1950 to the present, is expected to downturn by 2050.
It can be seen from the graph that in 1950, New Zealand population aged between 15 to 34 was above 30%, racking first among four groups surveyed. This was following by the figure for the 0-14 group (27%), 35-64 (15%) and 65+ (10%). The 15-34 aged group reached a peak at 45 % and decline a little bit at 42.5% in 1990, followed by another decline to only 30% in 2010. At the same time, the population aged between 0 and 14 showed a steady downturn, just under 25% in 2010. Whereas two oldest groups 35 to 64 and 65+ increased sharply to 17% and 11% respectively in 2010.
By 2050, New Zealand population aged 35 to 64 and over 65 will have reached at nearly 35 % and 20% respectively which become the dominant part of population. In other hand the figure for the youngest groups will lower, these are expected to drop dramatically to 29% of the 15-34 aged group and 10% of the population aged from 0 to 14.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 284, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...up reached a peak at 45 % and decline a little bit at 42.5% in 1990, followed by another d...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1037.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 232.0 196.424390244 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.46982758621 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90276135726 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40551224314 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547413793103 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 277.2 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.6628439646 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.7 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.5 5.23603664747 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.276419516647 0.215688989381 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132874170904 0.103423049105 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.145687194956 0.0843802449381 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.236624579557 0.15604864568 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.149694533466 0.0819641961636 183% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 81.97 61.2550243902 134% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.5 10.3012195122 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.94 11.4140731707 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.96 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.