In countries where there is a high rate of unemployment, most pupils should be offered only primary education. There is no point in offering secondary education to those who have no hope of finding a job. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
In developing nations with high unemployment rate, it is said that offering secondary education to the children is hopeless and wasteful. However, I completely disagree with this opinion because I believe education brings more benefits to people besides only job seeking skills.
Firstly, secondary education helps children broaden their vision and thinking. It is the foundation of generating ideas and innovations. Primary school only teaches pupils literacy skills, numeracy skills and common knowledge with little analysis and evaluation. However, in secondary schools, students have the chance to study different subjects in depth with reasonings. They are encouraged to discover their strengths and interests to find their path in life. Therefore, children need more guidance to learn about themselves and others, to fully develop their personality, to learn fundamental knowledge and skills, and develop problem solving and critical thinking skills.
Secondly, puberty is an important stage in life for people. It is when youngsters need guidance most and school is a safe place for adolescents to learn about themselves. A person without good teachers is like a boat without a compass. Life will be harsh for them if they work too early. They will not able to deal with other people and how to solve problems by themselves. People without secondary education will become unskillful workers with limit knowledge and they may not be able to innovate and strive for success.
In conclusion, there are more requirements before entering the workplace besides being able to read and write. Therefore, secondary education is essential for everyone, especially places with high unemployment rate.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1442.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.54615384615 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7907391229 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.596153846154 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 446.4 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.7321663431 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.125 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.25 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5625 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21309178094 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.067705385191 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0745551244873 0.0667982634062 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149076204668 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0817111367747 0.056905535591 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.61 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.