The line graph shows the percentage of people living below the poverty line in developing countries for the year 1900 to 2050.
The given tabular chart highlights the information about the people living below the poverty line in four different developing nations by the world standards during the year 1990 to 2050. The data is calibrated in per centum.
It can be seen that the people below the poverty line were lying between 0 to 20 per cent in China and India in 1990. In addition to this, they increased drastically in the year 2000 and was 70 per cent in India whereas 55 per cent in China. Furthermore, it is estimated that the number of people below the people line was 10 per cent in China and 30 per cent in India in the year 2050.
Moving further, in Mexico, the people below poverty line gradually increased up to 90 per cent in the year 2000 but the people remain stable in the year of 2050. Apart from this, in Brazil, there were 30 per cent people below the poverty line in the year 1900 and 1950. Moreover, people were increased drastically in the year 2000 to 95 per cent while it gradually decreases in the year 2000.
Overall, it is evident that the people below the poverty line increases drastically in Brazil from the year 1900 to 2050 and will also reach near Mexico.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-09-24 | Raman Preet kaur | 56 | view |
| 2018-08-08 | Khanchan | 67 | view |
| 2018-07-11 | Sharma Saab | 74 | view |
- The table below shows the results of a survey of the average number of cars per hour using three suburban roads during working hours in a ten-year pollution monitoring programme. Traffic calming was introduced in Harper Lane at the beginning of 1999. 67
- Consumer goods have become the most important part of human lives. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 11
- Nowadays more tasks at home and work are being performed by robots. Why do you think it is happening? Is it a negative or positive development? 56
- Light corpol punishment is being reintroduced in schools of UK. What are the advantages and diaadvantages of it. Discuss. 61
- Polygamy has lead to massive divorce rate around the globe. Give possible solution and discuss the reasons behind the issue? 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, moreover, so, whereas, while, apart from, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 958.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 214.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.47663551402 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.27352656682 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.429906542056 0.547539520022 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 277.2 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.9372965325 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.444444444 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7777777778 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 5.23603664747 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.357284217222 0.215688989381 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.193829269155 0.103423049105 187% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118490613266 0.0843802449381 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.269775750049 0.15604864568 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0516654601296 0.0819641961636 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.0 11.4140731707 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.14 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.