The table below shows the results of a survey of the average number of cars per hour using three suburban roads during working hours in a ten-year pollution monitoring programme. Traffic calming was introduced in Harper Lane at the beginning of 1999.

Essay topics:

The table below shows the results of a survey of the average number of cars per hour using three suburban roads during working hours in a ten-year pollution monitoring programme. Traffic calming was introduced in Harper Lane at the beginning of 1999.

The given tabular chart demonstrates the information about the average number of cars per hour by pollution monitoring programme during working hours and traffic calming was introduced in Harper Lane at the beginning of 1999.

It can be seen that the average number of cars increased with the increase in the year but when the traffic calming was introduced in Harper Lane the number of cars decreased and were 204 cars only. In addition to this, there had 173 cars in the year 2000 in Harper Lane. Furthermore, in 2001 and 2002 the average number of cars were 178 and 193 respectively.

Moving further, in the Great York Way the average number of cars had fluctuated from the year 1993 to 2000 while it remains constant in the year 2000 and 2002. Apart from this, the number of cars increased from the year 1993 to 1996 but it decreased suddenly in the year 1997 and 1998. Moreover, the number of cars in Long Lane was 1000, 1200, 1400 and 1400 respectively in 1999, 2000, 2001 and 2002.

Overall, it is evident that, the average number of cars in three suburban roads was minimum in the year 1993 but it increased in the year 2002.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-06-16 aldryan.wb 78 view
2019-04-23 Indri Eka Putri 78 view
2018-10-31 ymyhcd 78 view
2018-07-10 Sharma Saab 67 view
2016-12-15 elnuroruclu 87 view

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, moreover, while, apart from, in addition

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 939.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.60294117647 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35834245253 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.455882352941 0.547539520022 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 259.2 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.1068668823 43.030603864 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.375 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.25 5.23603664747 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.413638169438 0.215688989381 192% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.195821439927 0.103423049105 189% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.140828594638 0.0843802449381 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.295577262972 0.15604864568 189% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.142379391873 0.0819641961636 174% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 71.48 61.2550243902 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.7 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.35 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.