The line graphs show the production and demand for steel in million tonnes and the number of workers employed in the steel industry in the UK in 2010
The first given graph illustrates the amount of steel produced and demanded in Great Britain and Northern Ireland in the year 2010, while the second line graph provides the total of people working in steel factories at the mention places during the same time period.
Overall, the demand and the number of employers were higher than the production during the first half of the year. Then, on August all three values plummeted. However, on December the demanded amount of steel experimented a sudden increase, surpassing the other two figures.
The amount of material produced and the sum of workers followed a similar trend all year round. On the first month of 2010 both values had a rising pattern, reaching their highest numbers (5,000 million tones and just over 5,500 employers). Afterwards, they leveled off, to then drop slightly, reaching around 2,500 people and almost 3,000 million tones. Around August, they went up considerably, to finally suffered a dramatic decrease.
The volume of demanded steel fluctuated during the first half of 2010, peaking at three thousand million tones at the end of March. Then, it significantly declined until there was no demand just before December started. Finally, it upsurged.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-29 | nobitaa | 67 | view |
| 2022-07-04 | mybinh2005 | 67 | view |
| 2021-10-21 | stanie calitex | 84 | view |
| 2021-08-31 | Han Duyen | 73 | view |
| 2021-07-14 | Sanaullah97 | 73 | view |
- The line graphs show the production and demand for steel in million tonnes and the number of workers employed in the steel industry in the UK in 2010 78
- The diagram below shows the production of electricity using a system called Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion OTEC Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information below 59
- Nowadays families are not as close as in the past and a lot of people have become used to this Explain the reasons for this and discuss any possible effects it may have on society 73
- Smoking not only harms the smoker but also those who are nearby Therefore smoking should be banned in public places To what extend do you agree or disagree 73
- The plans below show Ashford in 2010 and Ashford now Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, second, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1034.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22222222222 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47495360923 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616161616162 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 294.3 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 60.1504999533 43.030603864 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.0 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.36363636364 5.23603664747 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26429848564 0.215688989381 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0778173556252 0.103423049105 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0738613469341 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156370451894 0.15604864568 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.052649601296 0.0819641961636 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.7 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.