The map below show the village of Stoke ford in 1930 and in 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

The given diagrams illustrate a number of changes that took place at indigo cottage between 1990 and 2010.

overall, this map indicates that the indigo cottage was expanded and well-developed in the last two decades.

The first and the major change happened in the expansion. Two adjacement plots were purchased in 1991 and 1993, respectively. The first plot was located to the southern side of the original plot and the second plot, which is almost the double size of the original plot, is located at the eastern border.

Besides the expansion, an amphitheatre was added to cottage from 1992 to 1994.In addition, the cottage also witnessed the planting of an orchard in the northern part. A pond was added to the garden in 1996 and in the same year a vegetable garden was also developed on the other side of the plot from the orchard. In 2002, few trees were planted along the southern and northern edge,which was just close to the orchard, of the garden. In 2006-07, an open air swimming pool was built in the land purchased in 1989.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (2 votes)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Overall
...ndigo cottage between 1990 and 2010. overall, this map indicates that the indigo cot...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 79, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
... was added to cottage from 1992 to 1994.In addition, the cottage also witnessed th...
^^
Line 7, column 382, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , which
...ted along the southern and northern edge,which was just close to the orchard, of the g...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, second, so, well, in addition

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 866.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78453038674 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51567534619 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.546961325967 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 255.6 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.1712384059 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.2222222222 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1111111111 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 5.23603664747 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0151650884727 0.215688989381 7% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.00760304240936 0.103423049105 7% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0142239898965 0.0843802449381 17% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0171068454211 0.15604864568 11% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0171068454211 0.0819641961636 21% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.25 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.