People say that reading for pleasure helps people to develop imagination and better language skills than watching TV To what extent do you agree or disagree

Essay topics:

People say that reading for pleasure helps people to develop imagination and better language skills than watching TV.
To what extent do you agree or disagree.

Reading as a hobby, to many people, can develop imagination and linguistic ability. I only partiially agree with this statement and will elaborate my resons in the following essay.
On one side of the matter, reading for pleasure can impove imagination nd language learning in some ways. To begin with, readers benefit from the mental stimulation since they must translate and visualize fictional characters. The Godfather novel, a 20th literature masterpiece, is claimed to deepen readers’ understanding into the world of criminals and how crime syndicates operate their business. This novel would give any readers some kind of experiences which they have never been transferred to in real life. Additionally, reading enthusiasts could learn a wide range of lexis and syntax through contact with written materials on a frequent basis. Lexical units along with grammatical structures may be sophisticatedly used and varied for delicate effects. Language learners, thus, may enlarge their idiolect and grammar points, and also apprehend the application of such language in different contexts.
On the other side of the matter, imagination and language ability can also be enhanced by watching television. One legitimate reaosn is that insightful knowledge of the world could be provided to the general public by certain documentary programs. One classic example is that culinary shows might encourage viewers to picture the taste of dishes in many cuisines, which may foster a desire to further explore them in future time. In relation to language, watching TV is usually regarded as an effective approach for boosting productive skills and pronunciation. This is because the audience needs to develop nuanced listening while viewing words in characters’dialogs, and they can absorb new words, then widen the range of vocabulary by reading subtitles in foreign movies. They can not only learn how to articulate words in a right fashion but also mimic accents from native speakers while viewing authentic TV programs.
In summary, it is transparent that creativity and linguistic resources could be increased thanks to the help of reading as a leisure activity, watching television, on the other hand, can also bring the same advatages. What is necessary for individuals is the balance between both forms of entertainment.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2021-12-13 nguyendangquang.aspect 89 view
2021-08-25 trinhhh 61 view
Essays by user nguyendangquan… :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 71, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ding for pleasure can impove imagination nd language learning in some ways. To be...
^^
Line 3, column 200, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...e of the world could be provided to the general public by certain documentary programs. One cl...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 823, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a right fashion" with adverb for "right"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... not only learn how to articulate words in a right fashion but also mimic accents from native spea...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, then, thus, while, in summary, kind of, to begin with, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1969.0 1615.20841683 122% => OK
No of words: 361.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45429362881 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35889894354 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02372303471 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 176.041082164 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617728531856 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 619.2 506.74238477 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.4609876989 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.823529412 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2352941176 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.64705882353 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164180557622 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0511663916888 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0498176561675 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.099028756229 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00705243665825 0.056905535591 12% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.97 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 78.4519038076 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.