The map below shows the development of a seaside village between 1995 and the present.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
930 and in 2010
The map illustrates how a coastal village of a coastal village as it was in 1995 and the current layout of it
Overall, there have been several shifts with the most noticeable being the increases in accommodation. This village has also been substantially urbanized with the introduction of sports facilities replacing the original green areas
In 1995, to the south of the map where the sea is, there was previously a fishing industry, with a fishing port and quite a large fish market as well. Next to this was a small café. On the other side of the road running by the sea, stood a line of shops and a hotel, while situated in the northeast part of the village were farmland and a park with trees. The main housing of the village was located in the northwest around a main road that runs from the coastal road, with twelve houses, four of them encircled by a smaller side street.
Turning to the present-day map, it is apparent that the fishing amenities have all gone, being replaced by four apartments, and the shops have become restaurants. The café remained intact, so does the hotel, albeit with an addition of a car park. Having been converted into a golf course, the farmland has now gone, while the forest park has been removed to make way for tennis courts. Although the old houses remain, new ones have been built, along with a new road with two new houses beside it
- Because computers can translate all languages very quickly and accurately learning a foreign language is a waste of time To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- punished 67
- The diagram below shows the process for recycling plastic bottles Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The chart below shows numbers of incidents and injuries per 100 million passenger miles travelled PMT by transportation type in 2002 84
- The pie charts show the destination of export goods in three countries in 2010 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 232, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ities replacing the original green areas In 1995, to the south of the map where t...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 496, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...a new road with two new houses beside it
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1146.0 965.302439024 119% => OK
No of words: 248.0 196.424390244 126% => OK
Chars per words: 4.62096774194 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46361398368 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 106.607317073 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556451612903 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 341.1 283.868780488 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 69.7733544246 43.030603864 162% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.333333333 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5555555556 22.9334400587 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.77777777778 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0957140569638 0.215688989381 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0381497705783 0.103423049105 37% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0342632537445 0.0843802449381 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0680982732784 0.15604864568 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0441684298249 0.0819641961636 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.