The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now, and plans for its development.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The frames illustrate the present structure and future redevelopment plan of
Islip town center.
Overall, the navigation system will be changed completely, along with
relocation of old structures and also introducing several new facilities for
people’s convenience.
Talking about the first image, the navigation system is unevenly distributed
throughout the city. A narrow main road passes straight between of city having
shops on both North and South direction. Two paths diverging from the
beginning and end of main road contains School and Park at their end
respectively, space between them is used for housing area.
Having a look at the later image shows that the whole city will be enclosed
inside a Dual carriageway restricting entry of vehicles in town. Former main
road will be widened and only be used by pedestrians, On the North of this
path Bus station, shopping center and car parking will be constructed whereas
shops on the South will remain untouched. Park and school will retain their
position but school will be outside of the main city and also park will be small
in area and school will be developed a little. The remaining areas will be
utilized by building houses.
- Government should spend more money on railways rather than roadways To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 89
- Sales of Fairtrade labelled coffee and bananas 1999 2004 81
- Geothermal power plant 84
- the chart below shows the percentage of adults of different age groups in the UK who used internet everyday from 2003 2006 80
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, look, so, whereas, talking about
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 1.00243902439 998% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1032.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26530612245 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69472775699 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607142857143 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 298.8 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.2280913472 43.030603864 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.666666667 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7777777778 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.55555555556 5.23603664747 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 17.0 3.83414634146 443% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0760915252859 0.215688989381 35% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0364302351704 0.103423049105 35% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0323584414058 0.0843802449381 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0220821786708 0.15604864568 14% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0233091837147 0.0819641961636 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.