The maps below show the changes in the art gallery ground floor in 2015 and present day.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons.
The maps depict the modifications to the ground floor of an art gallery from 2015 to the present day. Overall, the ground floor underwent a complete transformation with various facilities replaced, relocated or added.
In 2015, the main entrance was placed in the south of the gallery. Once visitors entered the building, they could see a reception desk in the middle of the entrance halls with the staircase located in the north of the receptionist. There were four exhibition rooms in total, namely exhibition room 1 to 3 in the east side of the building, while the exhibition room 4, the largest one, took up the southwest corner adjacent to the gallery office on its north. A cafe, where souvenirs were sold, could be found in the northwest corner.
At present, only the exhibition room 1 to 3 remain intact. It is conspicuous that the reception desk has been moved slightly to its south with the central spot in the building. A novel lift has been installed next to the right of the stair and the left of exhibition room 3. The most noticeable change belongs to the exhibition room 4, which has been halved to make space for the children’s area in the southwest corner while its remaining area is used for temporary exhibition. In addition, the gallery room has been relocated to where the cafe was to free up space for a vending machine and entrance stalls.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, while, as to, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 3.97073170732 353% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1135.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 239.0 196.424390244 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7489539749 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93187294222 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68070582408 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 106.607317073 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539748953975 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 338.4 283.868780488 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.3953502448 43.030603864 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.181818182 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7272727273 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134288348556 0.215688989381 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0616841325042 0.103423049105 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101655590739 0.0843802449381 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123645480881 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113539042541 0.0819641961636 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.27 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.