In the most successful companies, some people think that communication between employers and workers is the most important factor. Others think that other factors are more important.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
The present world has been developing significantly in numerous fields such as technology, economy, art…, which leads to the need for continuous improvement for an organization to meet the requirements. Some people state that communication/interaction between leaders and staff largely contributes to the success of companies, while the opponents opine that we should consider other factors as the major ones. From the vantage point, I will dissect both opinions with specific rationales and give the reasons why I approve of the first idea in the essay below.
On the one hand, encouraging face to face and online communication has amazing effects on the sustainability of a great number of huge companies due to some reasons. First, it improves the understanding between the CEOs and the employees as the managers know what the weaknesses as well as the strengths of their teams are in order to adjust them immediately. In Google, for instance, clear/effective communication is compulsory when conflicts arise while team-working. Second, staff are capable of recognizing the strong linking to their leaders, which stimulates considerably the confidence and productivity. Furthermore, it alternates the traditional/conventional and passive working style that the bosses always blame their employees for their mistakes. It would also create a comfortable environment for exchanging information.
On the other hand, there are several factors that contribute to the overall success of colossal organizations. It is evident that the ability to analyze the global tendency is crucial since the world-wide consumers’ standards are likely to fluctuate everyday. Also, the digital and non-digital marketing of commodities in Samsung, Apple, Microsoft,... is one of various approaches to ensure the widespread usage of the companies.
In conclusion, the success or failure of one business depends on a great number of reasons, especially the communication amongst staff and employers. With communication, businessmen should think twice about a multitude of suggestions coming from their workers to ensure the positive outcomes.
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Some people think that instead of preventing climate change we need to find a way to live with it To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- These days a great number of children prefer spending time on computer games rather than on sports Why is it Is it a positive or negative development 89
- Some people think that instead of preventing climate change we need to find a way to live with it To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Some people spend a lot of money celebrating personal family events such as weddings and birthdays How important is it to celebrate such events Do you think people spend too much money on these events 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 484, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... arise while team-working. Second, staff are capable of recognizing the strong li...
^^
Line 3, column 251, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...mers’ standards are likely to fluctuate everyday. Also, the digital and non-digital mark...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 348, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
...commodities in Samsung, Apple, Microsoft,... is one of various approaches to ensur...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, second, so, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1815.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.72555205047 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.55741703962 2.80592935109 127% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611987381703 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 567.9 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.6544243868 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.0 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1333333333 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.46666666667 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154516325999 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0429119595017 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0593897544311 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0865659308278 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0392410054369 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.95 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.36 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 78.4519038076 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.